Amazon's pricing is a lot like Photoshop - learn all you want to about it, but before you finish one pass of learning they've added a whole new set - you will never catch up. S3 also has all sorts of there options like reduced redundancy which can save a bit more on standard S3, but I don't think on glacier, but not sure. For the latter you probably don't care if they charge you a penny a gig or so to get the data back. you put in a request and wait.ī2 pricing is $0.005/GB, so it's slightly more than Glacier without the restrictions on download waits.īoth have other transactional costs but both usually do not cost much for those unless you are doing a mass upload the first time, or a mass download for recovery. Glacier requires you wait a period of time to download items, i.e. My guess is you have some lifecycle rules or otherwise are moving items into Glacier, so that's why it is cheaper than it might seem. That is $0.004/GB, with a deeper frozen version at $0.00099. Your comment about glacier probably means you are using that (which I guess is technically "S3 Glacier" but today is the first time I heard that term). Whether that's expensive or cheap depends on how many images you have. Click to expand.S3 standard pricing is $0.023/GB ( source).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |